Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive169% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 06 '23 at 14:14
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 76.9
1-Core 108
2-Core 206
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 639
62% 507 Pts
64-Core 866
54% 866 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Zotac(19DA 6630) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 545.92
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
127% Outstanding
Lighting 178
Reflection 168
Parallax 178
145% 175 fps
MRender 181
Gravity 130
Splatting 114
113% 142 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 127%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8250G 250GB
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 250 180 169 184 163 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
169% Outstanding
Read 1,434
Write 948
Mixed 926
SusWrite 212
195% 880 MB/s
4K Read 56.3
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 66.2
228% 77.2 MB/s
DQ Read 782
DQ Write 467
DQ Mixed 309
315% 519 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 169%
Great: 236%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
399GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 160 160 161 161 161 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 132
Write 128
Mixed 93.5
SusWrite 160
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
205% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 154 156 154 153 145 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 134
Write 149
Mixed 68.8
SusWrite 153
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
63% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 2666 DDR4 3200 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
MC Read 35.3
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 29.3
91% 31.8 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 23.1
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 89.4
45% 89.4 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 6 214 59 144 23.5" 1280 720 AUS2420 ASUS VG24V
Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,717 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $407
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback