Lenovo 2114A22

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 2114A22  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Annapurna CRB
Memory0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130308
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 06 '23 at 12:52
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 71%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-5300B APU
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
40.4% Average
Memory 72.2
1-Core 33.8
2-Core 47.2
37% 51.1 Pts
4-Core 53.7
8-Core 54.1
7% 53.9 Pts
64-Core 52.4
3% 52.4 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7480D
Legend(17AA 3089) 224MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.13% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 2.3
2% 2.87 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 3.4
2% 3 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.13%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3320413CS 320GB
224GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CA12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 19 17 25 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
9.82% Terrible
Read 13.4
Write 25.4
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 20.8
15% 19.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 9.82%
Great: 56%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: LDM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 128 132 126 125 122 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 49.8
Write 126
Mixed 48.4
SusWrite 127
64% 87.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-PB 4GB
1333, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.2% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 7.1
18% 6.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 4.9
16% 5.7 GB/s
Latency 92.5
43% 92.5 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 52 24 76 19" 1280 720 LEN24CB LEN L192p
Typical 2114A22 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 2114A22

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback