Gigabyte B450M DS3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemGigabyte B450M DS3H
MotherboardGigabyte B450M DS3H  (all builds)
Memory51.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 06 '23 at 00:33
Run Duration252 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
86% Excellent
Memory 88.5
1-Core 116
2-Core 238
83% 148 Pts
4-Core 449
8-Core 775
74% 612 Pts
64-Core 1,177
73% 1,177 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 86%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.2% Above average
Lighting 64.7
Reflection 65.1
Parallax 59.7
53% 63.2 fps
MRender 66.1
Gravity 69.8
Splatting 63.2
54% 66.4 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
227GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 737 364 374 263 410 441 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
66GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 384 437 434 171 112 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 472
Write 438
Mixed 385
SusWrite 333
91% 407 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 33.6
4K Mixed 36.1
122% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 87.3
DQ Mixed 162
138% 212 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 134%
ST4000DM 005-2DP166 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 95 110 99 98 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 165
Write 138
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 100
154% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 69%
WDC WD64 00AAKS-65A7B2 640GB
575GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 95 110 100 98 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 104
Write 101
Mixed 70.1
SusWrite 101
127% 93.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
105% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 43%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 5.7 1.3 1.5 1.2 1.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
22.7% Poor
Read 131
Write 68.1
Mixed 79.8
SusWrite 2
82% 70.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
60% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 62%
ST3000DM 001-9YN166 3TB
734GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.5 4.3 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
24.2% Poor
Read 140
Write 77.7
Mixed 94.1
SusWrite 1.2
93% 78.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
68% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB-$139
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 41.9
MC Write 34.4
MC Mixed 37.3
108% 37.9 GB/s
SC Read 27.9
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 32.9
92% 32.2 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 105%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 27" 1280 720 ACI27C3 MX279
Typical GA-B450M DS3H-CF Builds (Compare 16,517 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450M DS3H - $88

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $366
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback