Asus P8H61-MX R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics43.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-MX R2.0  (all builds)
Memory7.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20121029
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateNov 05 '23 at 18:35
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 84%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Memory 73.2
1-Core 80.1
2-Core 139
58% 97.5 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 361
37% 299 Pts
64-Core 440
27% 440 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.2.2
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.7% Average
Lighting 54.3
Reflection 24.9
Parallax 73
44% 50.7 fps
MRender 56.5
Gravity 59.6
Splatting 43.3
42% 53.1 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 192 179 183 182 181 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.1% Above average
Read 228
Write 210
Mixed 202
SusWrite 189
47% 207 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 40.2
4K Mixed 26.8
85% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 199
149% 198 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 124%
WD Re 4TB (2012)-$70
3TB free
Firmware: 01.01K03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 162 162 161 163 161 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 158
Mixed 73.7
SusWrite 162
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
215% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL10-10-10 D3-1866 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
49.6% Average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 16.3
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 11.7
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 57 60 21.5" 1280 720 SAM09C5 S22C450
Typical P8H61-MX R2.0 Builds (Compare 738 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-MX R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback