Infinix ZERO BOOK 13

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics21.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemInfinix ZERO BOOK 13  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault EM_IDL822_V2.0
Memory21 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230629
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 05 '23 at 16:16
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
58% Above average
Memory 56.8
1-Core 79.1
2-Core 159
55% 98.4 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 592
54% 455 Pts
64-Core 1,087
67% 1,087 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 58%
Great: 115%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Device(0100 2782) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Lighting 25.1
Reflection 29.1
Parallax 29.5
20% 27.9 fps
MRender 26.2
Gravity 36.6
Splatting 22.5
23% 28.4 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee XP2100F001T 1TB
889GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.1.17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1059 986 895 938 823 905 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 387
Write 915
Mixed 720
SusWrite 934
169% 739 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 57.5
4K Mixed 27.7
103% 36.6 MB/s
DQ Read 412
DQ Write 205
DQ Mixed 174
165% 264 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 118%
Great: 401%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
132% Outstanding
MC Read 51.8
MC Write 58.8
MC Mixed 52.4
155% 54.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 18.8
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 109%
This bench: 132%
Great: 158%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 60 60 15.5" 1280 720 KDB0526
Typical ZERO BOOK 13 Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Infinix ZERO BOOK 13

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback