Asus PRIME Z690-P WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 114%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics76.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive329% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z690-P WIFI  (all builds)
Memory54.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220812
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 05 '23 at 15:15
Run Duration297 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700KF-$189
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Memory 78.7
1-Core 204
2-Core 410
119% 231 Pts
4-Core 801
8-Core 1,529
139% 1165 Pts
64-Core 2,343
145% 2,343 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 114%
Great: 121%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.7% Very good
Lighting 98.3
Reflection 94.9
Parallax 87.7
80% 93.6 fps
MRender 98.6
Gravity 89.2
Splatting 74.2
70% 87.3 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
381GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1638 2077 2268 2310 1484 1401 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
329% Outstanding
Read 3,114
Write 1,960
Mixed 2,748
SusWrite 1,863
542% 2,421 MB/s
4K Read 73.1
4K Write 49.7
4K Mixed 54.3
207% 59 MB/s
DQ Read 1,123
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 362
330% 534 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 329%
Great: 488%
Samsung MZVLQ1T0HBLB-00B 1TB
349GB free
Firmware: FXM7AK1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 909 750 1800 1682 1719 412 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
189% Outstanding
Read 1,361
Write 1,408
Mixed 1,251
SusWrite 1,212
295% 1,308 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 46.4
4K Mixed 37.8
129% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 788
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 152
194% 365 MB/s
Poor: 135%
This bench: 189%
Great: 264%
Kingston SNVS1000G 1TB
823GB free
Firmware: S8442105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 857 821 1224 1188 314 482 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
153% Outstanding
Read 1,305
Write 1,297
Mixed 922
SusWrite 814
244% 1,084 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 57.7
4K Mixed 21
119% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 626
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 174
178% 304 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 153%
Great: 246%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: HP33
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 169 169 169 170 170 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 142
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 166
101% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 114%
JMicron Generic DISK00 48TB
21.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 37 38 38 38 37 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.1% Poor
Read 55.8
Write 33.8
Mixed 29.1
SusWrite 36.9
49% 38.9 MB/s
4K Read 9.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0
65% 3.4 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT32G48C40U5.M16A1 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
164% Outstanding
MC Read 64.8
MC Write 65.8
MC Mixed 61.6
183% 64.1 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 50.9
SC Mixed 30
95% 33.3 GB/s
Latency 88.1
45% 88.1 ns
Poor: 129%
This bench: 164%
Great: 168%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 60 27" 1920 1009 ACR013B Acer T272HL
Typical PRIME Z690-P WIFI Builds (Compare 5,164 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 209%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 230%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z690-P WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $1,015
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback