Today's hottest deals

Asus X55A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus X55A  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X55A
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 05 '23 at 08:17
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User EST-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium B980
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
36% Below average
Memory 58
1-Core 55
2-Core 79.6
41% 64.2 Pts
4-Core 84.3
8-Core 79.7
11% 82 Pts
64-Core 87.5
5% 87.5 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 14C7) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.93% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 0.7
1% 0.97 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.37 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.93%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 120GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 51 73 44 36 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 346
Write 230
Mixed 274
SusWrite 68.7
51% 230 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 38.8
4K Mixed 22.1
84% 28.1 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 152
116% 159 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Atermiter5.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 6.3
19% 6.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 5.8
16% 5.73 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 41 33 60 15.5" 1280 720 SEC324A
Typical X55A Builds (Compare 264 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X55A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $35
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback