Asus X55A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 7.57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus X55A  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X55A
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 30 '23 at 13:24
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User EST-User
Background CPU 61%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium B980
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
7.57% Terrible
Memory 2.8
1-Core 49.6
2-Core 66.5
20% 39.6 Pts
4-Core 69.9
8-Core 74.3
10% 72.1 Pts
64-Core 84.7
5% 84.7 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 7.57%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 14C7) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.66% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 1.1
Parallax 1.4
0% 1 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.37 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.66%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 120GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 18 100 30 87 33 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.9% Below average
Read 275
Write 214
Mixed 218
SusWrite 55.9
42% 191 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 27.2
4K Mixed 15
59% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 94.8
DQ Mixed 107
84% 118 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Atermiter5.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
11.1% Very poor
MC Read 4.3
MC Write 3.7
MC Mixed 4
11% 4 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 2.3
SC Mixed 3.4
9% 3.07 GB/s
Latency 476
8% 476 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X55A Builds (Compare 264 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X55A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback