TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive173% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHUANANZHI
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-F8 GAMING
Memory25.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211213
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 05 '23 at 05:08
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2666 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 80.2
1-Core 97.8
2-Core 192
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 743
67% 565 Pts
64-Core 1263
78% 1263 Pts
Poor: 66% ↑
This bench: 76.1%
 Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
PowerColor(148C 2409) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
122% Outstanding
Lighting 135
Reflection 132
Parallax 295
110% 187 fps
MRender 247
Gravity 147
Splatting 198
160% 197 fps
Poor: 113% ↑
This bench: 122%
 Great: 129%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
GV512 512GB
256GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1111H0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1411 1401 679 716 1013 482 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
173% Outstanding
Read 1,457
Write 1,405
Mixed 908
SusWrite 950
265% 1,180 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 81.3
4K Mixed 19.5
124% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 512
DQ Write 422
DQ Mixed 421
328% 452 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑
This bench: 173%
 Great: 199%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
256GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 78 74 75 77 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 75.5
Write 75.7
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 75.4
53% 71.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.8
212% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑
This bench: 43.6%
 Great: 79%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45
553GB free
Firmware: AX0P3D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 96 96 96 96 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 90.8
Write 92.3
Mixed 32.6
SusWrite 95.3
56% 77.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑
This bench: 53.4%
 Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.7% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 15.2
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 15.6
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 29% ↑
This bench: 50.7%
 Great: 97%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 28.8" 1280 720 GSM59F1 LG ULTRAWIDE
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback