Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII HERO  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 04 '23 at 22:27
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Memory 90.6
1-Core 128
2-Core 254
88% 158 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 625
66% 529 Pts
64-Core 680
42% 680 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
Sapphire(1DA2 E445) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 137
Reflection 137
Parallax 303
112% 192 fps
MRender 251
Gravity 150
Splatting 206
165% 202 fps
Poor: 113%
This bench: 124%
Great: 129%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8120G 120GB
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61E1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 494
Write 390
Mixed 370
93% 418 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 98.2
4K Mixed 38.1
163% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 51.7
76% 146 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 87%
Patriot P210 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: PAFEC2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 146 88 89 88 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 321
Write 147
Mixed 205
SusWrite 119
44% 198 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 92.3
4K Mixed 30.8
137% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 255
DQ Mixed 126
113% 165 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFD824A.C16FHP 16GB
3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
MC Read 34.2
MC Write 36.3
MC Mixed 27.1
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 41.3
SC Mixed 27.8
83% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 21.5" 1280 720 SAC309A Casper
Typical MAXIMUS VIII HERO Builds (Compare 7,199 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $704
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback