Asus B85M-K PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics22.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus B85M-K PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160429
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateNov 04 '23 at 20:15
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1245 v3-$245
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 98.5
2-Core 195
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 509
55% 436 Pts
64-Core 514
32% 514 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4200-$820
Nvidia(10DE 1096) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 888 MHz, MLim: 1700 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 474.44
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
22.5% Poor
Lighting 24.5
Reflection 31.3
Parallax 35.4
20% 30.4 fps
MRender 41.5
Gravity 33.4
Splatting 27.9
27% 34.3 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 256GB SSD 256GB
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.1.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 236 204 147 183 131 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 362
Write 232
Mixed 250
SusWrite 189
58% 258 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 62.1
4K Mixed 24.7
94% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 90.6
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 125
88% 110 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 240%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$65
654GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 82 88 83 82 82 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 20% Great: 70%
Hitachi HUA721010KLA330 1TB-$38
795GB free
Firmware: GKAOAB0A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 81 82 82 82 82 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 82.4
Write 85.6
Mixed 41.7
SusWrite 81.9
53% 72.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 46%
Hitachi HUS724030ALA640 3TB
925GB free
Firmware: MF8OAC50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 149 148 150 150 149 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 124
Write 134
Mixed 71
SusWrite 149
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 94%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
773GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 98 99 101 103 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 150
Write 33.9
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 101
65% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
145% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 72%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$26
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 148 149 150 149 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 140
Write 133
Mixed 78.7
SusWrite 149
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 87%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 87 88 84 87 88 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 91.7
Write 87.5
Mixed 55.4
SusWrite 86.4
59% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600 CL9 Series 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
60.5% Good
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 19
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 19.2
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 48 12 60 18.1" 1280 720 DELA021 DELL 2007FP
Typical B85M-K PLUS Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus B85M-K PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $277
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback