Acer Aspire A517-51

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire A517-51  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Dragonite_KL
Memory9.1 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190522
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 04 '23 at 17:23
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
40.7% Average
Memory 52
1-Core 45.2
2-Core 112
40% 69.8 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 190
23% 179 Pts
64-Core 319
20% 319 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Acer(1025 121E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6519
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
4.2% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 5.7
4% 4.67 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 5
Splatting 7.5
5% 6.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.2%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$68
367GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 72 556 352 354 353 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 2,083
Write 1,711
Mixed 1,014
SusWrite 338
286% 1,286 MB/s
4K Read 134
4K Mixed 1.1
306% 67.5 MB/s
Poor: 73% Great: 130%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
405GB free
Firmware: 3B4Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 584 704 662 705 770 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 789
Write 706
Mixed 755
SusWrite 647
163% 724 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 55.6
4K Mixed 47
139% 45 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 285
216% 296 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 129%
Great: 295%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244BB0-CRC F301 G2JT-4AFR00 20GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
30% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 9.7
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 5.9
18% 6.37 GB/s
Latency 162
25% 162 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 30%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 58 41 60 17.2" 1280 720 CMN1746
Typical Aspire A517-51 Builds (Compare 152 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A517-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback