Intel X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardIntel X79  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 04 '23 at 14:19
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
68.6% Good
Memory 76.6
1-Core 73.6
2-Core 165
61% 105 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 640
57% 483 Pts
64-Core 985
61% 985 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Zotac(19DA 4378) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.1% Below average
Lighting 40.9
Reflection 43.5
Parallax 39.2
33% 41.2 fps
MRender 35.6
Gravity 39.6
Splatting 34.4
30% 36.5 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 36%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LS 256GB S300 256GB
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0615A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 381 385 407 402 382 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Read 435
Write 390
Mixed 378
SusWrite 393
90% 399 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 57.3
4K Mixed 21.8
96% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 48.1
95% 187 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70EB0- 1x16GB
1 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.3% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 8.4
26% 9.07 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 8.5
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 89.4
45% 89.4 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 55 60 23.8" 1280 720 NPC2400 XSC24HD
Typical X79 Builds (Compare 1,996 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $158
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback