Performance Results


Gaming 57% Gunboat	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 51% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	88.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	39.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-4640 0 60 User benchmarks, average bench 65% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	65.8% Good	Memory 81.3 1-Core 63.7 2-Core 143 58% 96.1 Pts	4-Core 272 8-Core 514 47% 393 Pts	64-Core 670 42% 670 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% Gigabyte(1458 3795) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	88.7% Excellent	Lighting 111 Reflection 123 Parallax 113 90% 116 fps	MRender 90.1 Gravity 116 Splatting 106 86% 104 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 88.7% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Fanxiang S101/240GB 240GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 199GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0424A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 169 176 167 190 195 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.6% Below average	Read 220 Write 191 Mixed 186 SusWrite 182 44% 195 MB/s	4K Read 17.9 4K Write 33.6 4K Mixed 11 59% 20.8 MB/s	DQ Read 20.5 DQ Write 80.4 DQ Mixed 13.3 21% 38.1 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 82%
SMI USB DISK 16GB 94 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 6GB free, PID 1502 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 6.5 6.5 6 6.5 6.5 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	4.91% Terrible	Read 17.7 Write 4.5 Mixed 6 SusWrite 6.2 10% 8.6 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 16% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.91% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2G70EB0- 1x16GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	26.1% Poor	MC Read 8.8 MC Write 7.8 MC Mixed 7.7 23% 8.1 GB/s	SC Read 8.4 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 7.5 24% 8.5 GB/s	Latency 78.1 51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 36%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

RAM
M393B5170GB0- 2x4GBSamsungBench 52%, 1,540 samples	127x
M393B1K70DH0- 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 1,683 samples	64x
HMT151R7BFR4C 4x4GBHynixBench 67%, 393 samples	58x

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $158