Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX504GD
Memory14 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210823
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 04 '23 at 13:56
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Memory 76.8
1-Core 89.1
2-Core 114
59% 93.5 Pts
4-Core 229
8-Core 379
37% 304 Pts
64-Core 435
27% 435 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 10C1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6446
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
3.89% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 5.8
Parallax 4.9
4% 5.03 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 5.8
4% 5.43 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.89%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,594
Write 1,393
Mixed 848
283% 1,278 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 60.4
4K Mixed 44.6
141% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 341
258% 346 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
SSD 512GB 512GB
399GB free
Firmware: W0221B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 328 331 340 353 355 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 224
Write 301
Mixed 292
SusWrite 335
65% 288 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 41
4K Mixed 16.1
73% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 65.9
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 38.6
54% 96.6 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 211%
External USB3.0 320GB
69GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 5.3 5.5 5.3 5.3 5.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
2.54% Terrible
Read 3.5
Write 5
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 5.3
3% 4.57 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 2.54%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 04EF TEAMGROUP-SD4-2666 24GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
42.6% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 12.8
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 13.2
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0064
Typical TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD Builds (Compare 2,640 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback