Fujitsu ESPRIMO Q520

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Fujitsu ESPRIMO Q520 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3223-C1
Memory	3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160825
Uptime	3.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 03 '23 at 22:18
Run Duration	164 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	28%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4350T 112 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	57% Above average	Memory 83.1 1-Core 74.6 2-Core 135 60% 97.6 Pts	4-Core 181 8-Core 189 24% 185 Pts	64-Core 214 13% 214 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15 230,189 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Fijitsu Siemens(1734 11E7) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549 Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	3.02% Terrible	Lighting 3.4 Reflection 2.5 Parallax 6.1 3% 4 fps	MRender 5.7 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 4.8 4% 4.23 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.02% Great: 3%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: S3H01103 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 480 Write 396 Mixed 52.7 68% 310 MB/s	4K Read 21.8 4K Write 23 4K Mixed 7.8 55% 17.5 MB/s	DQ Read 73.9 DQ Write 24.3 DQ Mixed 13.2 19% 37.1 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 102%
Flash Disk 3.0 2TB 482 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 2TB free, PID 1234 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 18.7 Write 5.5 Mixed 8.4 12% 10.9 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 1.6 108% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 14%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GB 30,873 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	44.3% Average	MC Read 15.2 MC Write 16.6 MC Mixed 14.2 44% 15.3 GB/s	SC Read 11.9 SC Write 13.7 SC Mixed 12.6 36% 12.7 GB/s	Latency 82 49% 82 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	66	58	60	24"	1280 720	BNQ78A8 BenQ G2450

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ESPRIMO Q520 Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO Q520

CPU
Core i3-4130TIntel $60Bench 56%, 5,264 samples	15x
Core i5-4590TIntelBench 60%, 6,079 samples	15x
Core i3-4160TIntelBench 58%, 2,374 samples	11x

GPU
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	35x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	25x
HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 43,454 samples	7x

SSD
HyperX 3K 120GBKingston $100Bench 74%, 46,066 samples	5x
MZ7LN128HCHP-00000 128GBSamsungBench 74%, 601 samples	3x
MZ7TE128HMGR-00004 128GBSamsungBench 66%, 696 samples	3x

RAM
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	6x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 26,681 samples	5x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 30,591 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 36% - Below average

Total price: $160

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16