Asus GL502VS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics68% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive175% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus GL502VS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL502VS
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190517
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 03 '23 at 20:01
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
61.4% Good
Memory 79.9
1-Core 76.1
2-Core 128
58% 94.8 Pts
4-Core 233
8-Core 398
38% 316 Pts
64-Core 430
27% 430 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1470) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68% Good
Lighting 80.4
Reflection 110
Parallax 83.1
66% 91.1 fps
MRender 88.7
Gravity 83.6
Splatting 92.6
73% 88.3 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 68%
Great: 82%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fanxiang S790 1TB
600GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN11273
SusWrite @10s intervals: 977 1332 1392 1417 1105 606 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
175% Outstanding
Read 1,453
Write 1,586
Mixed 1,423
SusWrite 1138
316% 1,400 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 46
4K Mixed 37.3
120% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 267
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 222
167% 224 MB/s
Poor: 218%
This bench: 175%
Great: 532%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 NB 8G 2666 1324 TSD4/8GB 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.3% Very good
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 24
80% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 27.7
SC Mixed 19.2
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 91.7
44% 91.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 53 60 15.5" 1280 720 LGD046F
Typical GL502VS Builds (Compare 429 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

System: Asus GL502VS - $1,607

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Total price: $1,607
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback