Asus GL502VS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics20.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive217% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus GL502VS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL502VS
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190517
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 02 '23 at 21:13
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
67% Good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 78.6
2-Core 142
62% 102 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 416
42% 343 Pts
64-Core 449
28% 449 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 67%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1470) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 399.24
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
20.2% Poor
Lighting 28.1
Reflection 28.6
Parallax 22
23% 26.2 fps
MRender 21.9
Gravity 11.9
Splatting 20.7
15% 18.2 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 82%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fanxiang S790 1TB
589GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN11273
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1192 1553 1597 1193 1074 723 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
217% Outstanding
Read 1,689
Write 1,746
Mixed 1541
SusWrite 1,222
349% 1,549 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 78.2
4K Mixed 51.6
172% 57.3 MB/s
DQ Read 615
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 486
360% 482 MB/s
Poor: 218%
This bench: 217%
Great: 532%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 NB 8G 2666 1324 TSD4/8GB 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.3% Very good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 23.9
80% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 19.9
58% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 21 0 60 15.5" 1280 720 LGD046F
Typical GL502VS Builds (Compare 429 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

System: Asus GL502VS - $1,607

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Total price: $1,607
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback