Positivo VJFE55F11X-XXXXXX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics14.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive147% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemPositivo VJFE55F11X-XXXXXX  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo VJFE-TGLBAT55
Memory1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221207
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateNov 03 '23 at 19:14
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Memory 51.3
1-Core 131
2-Core 233
73% 138 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 419
50% 384 Pts
64-Core 330
20% 330 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Device(0100 2782) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1371
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Lighting 17.2
Reflection 20.2
Parallax 20.4
14% 19.3 fps
MRender 16.9
Gravity 22.2
Splatting 14.9
14% 18 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CL1-8D512 512GB
423GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E990904 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 875 228 191 241 207 202 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
147% Outstanding
Read 1,464
Write 1,008
Mixed 892
SusWrite 324
205% 922 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 21.4
156% 65.8 MB/s
DQ Read 466
DQ Write 597
DQ Mixed 369
324% 477 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 147%
Great: 172%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM1P26KC4U1-BACS 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
55.3% Above average
MC Read 22.8
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 17.6
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 13.7
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 31 4 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0812
Typical VJFE55F11X-XXXXXX Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo VJFE55F11X-XXXXXX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback