Intel H61

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
MotherboardIntel H61  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201230
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateNov 03 '23 at 15:50
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 79
1-Core 83.3
2-Core 168
64% 110 Pts
4-Core 249
8-Core 253
34% 251 Pts
64-Core 254
16% 254 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Nvidia(10DE 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.11% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 1.2
3% 3.27 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 3.4
3% 4.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.11%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 256GB 256GB
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2101XKR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 209 208 208 220 222 MB/s
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55% Above average
Read 233
Write 212
Mixed 204
SusWrite 212
48% 215 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 45
4K Mixed 25.2
83% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 158
119% 155 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 55%
Great: 166%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$98
678GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 213 211 211 225 227 MB/s
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60.9% Good
Read 222
Write 210
Mixed 205
SusWrite 216
48% 213 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 47.4
4K Mixed 30
99% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 171
DQ Mixed 176
132% 177 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 121%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
779GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 9.1 8.9 9 9.1 8.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
3.17% Terrible
Read 7.7
Write 8.7
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 9
12% 8.48 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
2% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.17%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR3 8GB 1600MHz 16GB
0, 0 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.1% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 17.7
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 16.2
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 21.5" 1920 1080 SAM059A SyncMaster
Typical H61 Builds (Compare 10,283 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel H61

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback