Asus EX-H510M-V3

Performance Results


Gaming 71% Battleship	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 64% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	81.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	35.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Asus EX-H510M-V3 (all builds)
Memory	4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20220127
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 02 '23 at 21:25
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10400F-$97 153,026 User benchmarks, average bench 85% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	86.9% Excellent	Memory 90.9 1-Core 123 2-Core 243 86% 152 Pts	4-Core 447 8-Core 725 72% 586 Pts	64-Core 912 56% 912 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% MSI(1462 3754) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 537.42 Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	81.9% Excellent	Lighting 117 Reflection 108 Parallax 112 95% 112 fps	MRender 136 Gravity 101 Splatting 0.2 56% 79.2 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 81.9% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kioxia-exceria SATA SSD 480GB 7,893 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFA15.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 219 116 138 203 168 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	35.6% Below average	Read 152 Write 104 Mixed 86.9 SusWrite 210 31% 138 MB/s	4K Read 18.8 4K Write 19.9 4K Mixed 11.6 54% 16.8 MB/s	DQ Read 13.9 DQ Write 14.7 DQ Mixed 14.5 11% 14.4 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 100%
Samsung MZNLN256HAJQ-00000 256GB 3,055 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 59GB free Firmware: MVT2300Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 317 316 316 317 317 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 494 Write 474 Mixed 404 SusWrite 330 96% 426 MB/s	4K Read 38.8 4K Write 96.8 4K Mixed 53.8 179% 63.1 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 339 DQ Mixed 352 266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BL8G30C15U4RL.M8FE1 1x8GB 59 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (46^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	46% Average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 16.4 MC Mixed 11.7 43% 15.2 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 14.1 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 61.8 65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	25	3	165	27"	1280 720	SAM71DC LS27AG32x

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EX-H510M-V3 Builds (Compare 184 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 30%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus EX-H510M-V3

CPU
Core i5-10400Intel $99Bench 84%, 71,804 samples	33x
Core i5-10400FIntel $97Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	31x
Core i3-10100FIntel $70Bench 80%, 39,812 samples	30x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	24x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	12x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	12x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	19x
S800 240GBRamstaBench 57%, 1,330 samples	8x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	8x

RAM
Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 94%, 22,102 samples	11x
Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 2x8GBTeamBench 79%, 1,076 samples	9x
KF2666C16D4/8G 1x8GBKingstonBench 41%, 1,678 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 100% - Outstanding

Total price: $186

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16