Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 77% Battleship	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 63% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	88.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	6.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20200527
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 02 '23 at 20:03
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	47%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9600KF-$180 65,122 User benchmarks, average bench 93% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	83.7% Excellent	Memory 91.2 1-Core 129 2-Core 257 89% 159 Pts	4-Core 417 8-Core 563 62% 490 Pts	64-Core 591 37% 591 Pts
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 83.7% Great: 102%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$288 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Asus(1043 8735) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.15 Performing below potential (43^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	88.5% Excellent	Lighting 112 Reflection 126 Parallax 108 91% 115 fps	MRender 130 Gravity 92.8 Splatting 91.5 84% 105 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 88.5% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Shark 256GB NVMe M.2 256GB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 159% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0614B0G Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,340 Write 988 Mixed 827 233% 1,052 MB/s	4K Read 30.7 4K Write 34.1 4K Mixed 15.4 84% 26.7 MB/s	DQ Read 758 DQ Write 67.8 DQ Mixed 77 141% 301 MB/s
Poor: 121% Great: 196%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 246GB free Firmware: S3Z40107 SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 371 385 66 106 87 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	49.8% Average	Read 422 Write 347 Mixed 326 SusWrite 231 74% 332 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 49.8 4K Mixed 0.4 60% 23.9 MB/s	DQ Read 113 DQ Write 16.9 DQ Mixed 0.4 17% 43.3 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSBK.8FD 2x8GB 12,603 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	76.4% Very good	MC Read 30.2 MC Write 28.9 MC Mixed 22.7 78% 27.3 GB/s	SC Read 16.8 SC Write 26.9 SC Mixed 23.1 64% 22.3 GB/s	Latency 68 59% 68 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 1: 0P 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
1%	3%	32	215	59	144	23.8"	1920 1009	AOC2402 24G2W1G4

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,791 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	449x
Core i7-8700Intel $186Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	252x
Core i5-8400Intel $114Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	227x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $288Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	147x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	136x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	106x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	69x
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	49x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	43x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	85x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	51x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 82%, 87,241 samples	48x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $476

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16