Gigabyte GA-X3V7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics52.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X3V7  (all builds)
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180301
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 02 '23 at 10:19
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 71.3
1-Core 95.7
2-Core 186
67% 118 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 466
49% 392 Pts
64-Core 472
29% 472 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Gigabyte(1458 3458) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.4601
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Lighting 63.8
Reflection 71.9
Parallax 64.2
52% 66.6 fps
MRender 66
Gravity 63.6
Splatting 63.9
53% 64.5 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Pro 6000p NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$65
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 121P Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 256 242 109 109 126 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 814
Write 556
Mixed 573
SusWrite 201
119% 536 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 72.9
4K Mixed 37.2
127% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 528
DQ Mixed 327
270% 377 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 102%
Great: 125%
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-000H1 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: HPS0NEXH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1237 403 403 405 405 404 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
188% Outstanding
Read 1,772
Write 1,638
Mixed 1,288
SusWrite 543
293% 1,310 MB/s
4K Read 42.7
4K Write 81.3
4K Mixed 54.9
178% 59.6 MB/s
DQ Read 789
DQ Write 492
DQ Mixed 683
497% 654 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 188%
Great: 253%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT16G4SFD8213.C16FBR 859B CT16G4SFD8213.C16FAD 32GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
60.4% Good
MC Read 22
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 19.4
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 22.7
SC Mixed 17.9
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 95.1
42% 95.1 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 24 3 0 14" 1280 720 AUO1536
Typical GA-X3V7 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X3V7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $279WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback