Asus TUF Gaming FX505DV_FX505DV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive223% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
8 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DV_FX505DV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DV
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 02 '23 at 10:16
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
65.7% Good
Memory 70.1
1-Core 110
2-Core 196
71% 126 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 534
53% 432 Pts
64-Core 527
33% 527 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
Asus(1043 18F1) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.8.2
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Lighting 16.7
Reflection 14.8
Parallax 24.4
14% 18.6 fps
MRender 11.4
Gravity 20
Splatting 14.3
12% 15.2 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 14%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
844GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1162 1229 1225 1313 1161 820 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 1390
Write 1,394
Mixed 1,036
SusWrite 1,152
280% 1243 MB/s
4K Read 49.8
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 65.7
217% 74.5 MB/s
DQ Read 628
DQ Write 684
DQ Mixed 271
310% 528 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 223%
Great: 255%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CWE Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-3G2J1 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.6% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 25.9
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 20.6
SC Write 31
SC Mixed 22.8
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 120 15.5" 1280 720 AUOD0ED
Typical TUF Gaming FX505DV_FX505DV Builds (Compare 702 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DV_FX505DV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback