HP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-cb1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 132%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics135% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive327% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-cb1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8748
Memory59.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230727
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 02 '23 at 08:28
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Memory 94.3
1-Core 138
2-Core 274
94% 169 Pts
4-Core 525
8-Core 877
85% 701 Pts
64-Core 1,071
66% 1,071 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 96%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super Mobile)
HP(103C 8748) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2310 MHz, MLim: 4150 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Lighting 179
Reflection 279
Parallax 206
146% 222 fps
MRender 227
Gravity 157
Splatting 143
140% 176 fps
Poor: 98%
This bench: 135%
Great: 128%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S70 BLADE 1TB
578GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.2.F.66
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2142 2216 2231 2253 2137 2235 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
327% Outstanding
Read 1,577
Write 2,309
Mixed 1759
SusWrite 2,202
445% 1,962 MB/s
4K Read 55
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 75.5
246% 85.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,321
DQ Write 1,050
DQ Mixed 1,165
877% 1,179 MB/s
Poor: 276%
This bench: 327%
Great: 606%
XPG GAMMIX S50 Lite 1TB
603GB free
Firmware: 82A7U82C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1688 1775 1777 1775 1778 1780 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
315% Outstanding
Read 2045
Write 2,032
Mixed 1,320
SusWrite 1,762
402% 1,790 MB/s
4K Read 57.2
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 75
242% 81.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1280
DQ Write 973
DQ Mixed 1,111
835% 1,121 MB/s
Poor: 155%
This bench: 315%
Great: 458%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
351GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 471 477 476 477 477 477 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 462
Mixed 441
SusWrite 476
106% 470 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 73
4K Mixed 49.9
160% 53.7 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 325
245% 328 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 114%
Great: 137%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C20S4/32GX 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
94.1% Outstanding
MC Read 35
MC Write 37.7
MC Mixed 27
95% 33.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 40.7
SC Mixed 30.3
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 59.4
67% 59.4 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 23 2 144 84.6" 1280 720 VES3700 65UHD_LCD_TV
Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 17-cb1xxx Builds (Compare 1,324 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-cb1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback