Tecno MEGABOOK T15DA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics18.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive304% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemTecno MEGABOOK T15DA  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault MEGABOOK T15DA
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230719
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 02 '23 at 06:09
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800U
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Memory 68.7
1-Core 154
2-Core 307
92% 176 Pts
4-Core 559
8-Core 770
84% 664 Pts
64-Core 996
62% 996 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
AMD(1002 0123) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.8.1
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Lighting 22.9
Reflection 20.2
Parallax 32.6
19% 25.2 fps
MRender 16.5
Gravity 25.4
Splatting 22.7
18% 21.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee XP1000F512G 512GB
357GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.28
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1950 1941 2073 2151 2156 1096 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
304% Outstanding
Read 1914
Write 2295
Mixed 1710
SusWrite 1,895
441% 1,953 MB/s
4K Read 58.3
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 63.7
238% 83.7 MB/s
DQ Read 930
DQ Write 822
DQ Mixed 98.1
286% 617 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 304%
Great: 313%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H54G56CYRBX247 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB LPDDR4 clocked @ 4266 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
85% Excellent
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 28
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 39.3
SC Mixed 29.3
86% 30.2 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 85%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15E8
Typical MEGABOOK T15DA Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Tecno MEGABOOK T15DA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback