Lenovo 82QD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics12.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive174% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemLenovo 82QD  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory18.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230529
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 02 '23 at 05:18
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1235U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Memory 69.4
1-Core 162
2-Core 265
90% 166 Pts
4-Core 513
8-Core 710
77% 611 Pts
64-Core 972
60% 972 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Legend(17AA 3B3A) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Lighting 13.6
Reflection 20.2
Parallax 19.5
11% 17.8 fps
MRender 17.8
Gravity 21.2
Splatting 14.7
14% 17.9 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-256G-1101 256GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21160001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 281 216 218 217 217 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
174% Outstanding
Read 1,364
Write 900
Mixed 906
SusWrite 231
189% 850 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 63.7
232% 88.4 MB/s
DQ Read 677
DQ Write 826
DQ Mixed 554
473% 686 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 174%
Great: 179%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.C8FF Hynix HMAA1GS6CJR6N-XN 24GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
86.6% Excellent
MC Read 35.7
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 31.4
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 31.8
SC Mixed 22.6
69% 24 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1553
Typical 82QD Builds (Compare 81 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82QD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback