Asus P8B75-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive16.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8B75-M  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130613
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 01 '23 at 20:20
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 95.1
2-Core 168
71% 118 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 485
48% 393 Pts
64-Core 467
29% 467 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Zotac(19DA 5510) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
118% Outstanding
Lighting 154
Reflection 152
Parallax 152
126% 153 fps
MRender 182
Gravity 135
Splatting 119
116% 146 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 118%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 240GB SSD 240GB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3.0.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 36 18 31 18 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
16.8% Very poor
Read 128
Write 36.2
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 22.4
12% 55.7 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 8.2
34% 8.03 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 96%
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
122GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 143 143 141 143 142 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 115
Write 103
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 142
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
204% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 029E CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
58% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 18.4
58% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 18
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 31.5" 1280 720 GSM7765 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical P8B75-M Builds (Compare 1,515 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M - $470

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $902
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback