Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 3  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140530
Uptime12.9 Days
Run DateNov 01 '23 at 16:42
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 98.9
2-Core 192
75% 127 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 529
53% 433 Pts
64-Core 531
33% 531 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 1C06) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.4% Above average
Lighting 69.9
Reflection 72.2
Parallax 66.8
57% 69.6 fps
MRender 67.1
Gravity 69.4
Splatting 66.3
55% 67.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 120GB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 118 112 111 111 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 453
Mixed 361
SusWrite 139
81% 360 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 84.5
4K Mixed 47.8
161% 56.1 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 356
269% 361 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 112%
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39
174GB free
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 407 424 452 353 214 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 338
Write 404
Mixed 385
SusWrite 352
84% 370 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 80.5
4K Mixed 48.6
163% 55.8 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 148
168% 286 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 102%
Great: 123%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
208GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 106 108 106 107 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 160
Write 168
Mixed 98.8
SusWrite 106
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
239% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 0215 CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 KHX1600C9D3/4GX 0215 CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
59.1% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 18.2
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 18.7
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 65.1
62% 65.1 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 144 24" 1920 1017 BNQ7F31 ZOWIE XL LCD
Typical GA-Z97X-Gaming 3 Builds (Compare 3,160 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97X-Gaming 3 - $169

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $817
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback