Supermicro X9DAX

Performance Results


Gaming 92% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 118% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	96.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Supermicro X9DAX (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X9DAX
Memory	119.8 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150630
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 01 '23 at 13:54
Run Duration	200 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2696 v2 190 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	70.1% Very good	Memory 79.9 1-Core 80.2 2-Core 162 63% 108 Pts	4-Core 324 8-Core 644 57% 484 Pts	64-Core 2,477 153% 2,477 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Titan X Pascal-$286 8,692 User benchmarks, average bench 121% Nvidia(10DE 119A) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.01 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	125% Outstanding	Lighting 172 Reflection 186 Parallax 179 140% 179 fps	MRender 131 Gravity 173 Splatting 125 116% 143 fps
Poor: 108% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 132%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 105GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 363 332 330 327 323 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	96.9% Outstanding	Read 486 Write 472 Mixed 399 SusWrite 341 95% 425 MB/s	4K Read 33.8 4K Write 56.2 4K Mixed 40.9 133% 43.6 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 300 DQ Mixed 329 248% 334 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 96.9% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 164GB free Firmware: EXM01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 374 382 383 384 384 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	96.1% Outstanding	Read 495 Write 468 Mixed 394 SusWrite 380 98% 434 MB/s	4K Read 28.8 4K Write 56.6 4K Mixed 36 120% 40.5 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 328 DQ Mixed 350 264% 355 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 96.1% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 61GB free Firmware: EXM01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 208 211 211 212 212 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	67.1% Good	Read 260 Write 249 Mixed 247 SusWrite 210 54% 242 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 50.5 4K Mixed 34.4 112% 37.4 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 196 147% 197 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 59GB free Firmware: EXM01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 209 212 212 213 213 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	67.1% Good	Read 261 Write 250 Mixed 239 SusWrite 211 54% 240 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 50.5 4K Mixed 34.3 112% 37.4 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 191 DQ Mixed 197 148% 197 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 124%
Adata ED600 256GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 183GB free Firmware: 0204 SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 15 14 14 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	12.8% Very poor	Read 49.8 Write 22.8 Mixed 23.4 SusWrite 15.2 6% 27.8 MB/s	4K Read 16.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 6.6 34% 7.7 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 91%
WD My Passport 25E1 1TB 31,309 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 780GB free, PID 25e1 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 7.1 7.7 11 12 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	9.61% Terrible	Read 50.5 Write 22.7 Mixed 21.6 SusWrite 9.1 30% 26 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.8 32% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 9.61% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT42GR7BFR4C HMT42GR7BFR4C HMT42GR7AFR4C HMT42GR7AFR4C HMT42GR7BFR4C HMT42GR7BFR4C HMT42GR7AFR4C Sem... 128GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	111% Outstanding	MC Read 52.4 MC Write 42.4 MC Mixed 42.1 130% 45.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 6.7 24% 8.57 GB/s	Latency 78.3 51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	60	60	0.7"	1280 720	FNI0000 LCD TV

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X9DAX Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 80%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 108%

UFO

System: Supermicro X9DAX

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2696 v21stBench 62%, 190 samples	3x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v21stBench 66%, 1,377 samples	1x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	1x

GPU
Titan X PascalNvidia $286Bench 121%, 8,692 samples	3x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	1x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,198Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	1x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	2x
CS900 120GBPNY $25Bench 69%, 42,924 samples	1x
850 Pro 256GBSamsung $125Bench 102%, 141,929 samples	1x

RAM
HMT42GR7BFR4C HMT42GR7BFR4C HMT42GR7AFR4C HMT42GR7AFR4C HMT42GR7BFR4C HMT42GR7BFR4C HMT42GR7AFR4C Sem... 128GBHynixBench 110%, 3 samples	3x
M393B1K73CHD- 16x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 2 samples	1x
HMT42GR7AFR4A HMT42GR7AFR4A HMT42GR7AFR4A HMT42GR7AFR4A HMT42GR7AFR4A HMT42GR7AFR4A HMT42GR7AFR4A Sem... 224GBHynixBench 91%, 2 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $380

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16