HP OMEN by HP 25L Gaming Desktop GT14-1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 155%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics155% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive349% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN by HP 25L Gaming Desktop GT14-1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8B1D
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230328
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 01 '23 at 12:53
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13400F-$165
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Memory 74.4
1-Core 174
2-Core 352
104% 200 Pts
4-Core 634
8-Core 1,096
105% 865 Pts
64-Core 1,607
100% 1,607 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$385
HP(103C 8C36) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
155% Outstanding
Lighting 214
Reflection 196
Parallax 215
174% 209 fps
MRender 308
Gravity 169
Splatting 127
156% 201 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 155%
Great: 157%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00-1006 1TB
503GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2038 2079 2090 2206 2190 2179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
349% Outstanding
Read 2,956
Write 1,883
Mixed 1,888
SusWrite 2,130
495% 2,215 MB/s
4K Read 54.2
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 65.2
228% 78.9 MB/s
DQ Read 988
DQ Write 372
DQ Mixed 789
555% 716 MB/s
Poor: 161%
This bench: 349%
Great: 466%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP52U40S6HM-8FAE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
142% Outstanding
MC Read 61.1
MC Write 53.4
MC Mixed 51.3
158% 55.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 44.6
SC Mixed 25.6
84% 29.6 GB/s
Latency 90.7
44% 90.7 ns
Poor: 117%
This bench: 142%
Great: 144%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 165 23.8" 1920 1009 LEN66CF G24-20
Typical OMEN by HP 25L Gaming Desktop GT14-1xxx Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 174%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

System: HP OMEN by HP 25L Gaming Desktop GT14-1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $779
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback