Asus ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 227%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 226%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 115%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics201% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive417% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory115.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230928
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 01 '23 at 06:55
Run Duration445 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$310
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Memory 94.3
1-Core 191
2-Core 380
118% 222 Pts
4-Core 728
8-Core 1,267
121% 998 Pts
64-Core 1,682
104% 1,682 Pts
Poor: 105%
This bench: 115%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7800-XT
Sapphire(1DA2 D475) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.10.2
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
201% Outstanding
Lighting 260
Reflection 254
Parallax 524
212% 346 fps
MRender 336
Gravity 314
Splatting 291
254% 314 fps
Poor: 130%
This bench: 201%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
872GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3456 3438 3419 3243 3488 3415 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
417% Outstanding
Read 2,086
Write 3,304
Mixed 2,994
SusWrite 3,410
671% 2,948 MB/s
4K Read 60.7
4K Write 94.1
4K Mixed 70.2
232% 75 MB/s
DQ Read 1342
DQ Write 1085
DQ Mixed 1,215
909% 1,214 MB/s
Poor: 299%
This bench: 417%
Great: 592%
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
1TB free
Firmware: 3B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3310 3542 3546 3516 3554 3571 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
432% Outstanding
Read 2,328
Write 3,407
Mixed 2,898
SusWrite 3,506
690% 3,035 MB/s
4K Read 55.1
4K Write 96.7
4K Mixed 70
224% 73.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1391
DQ Write 1,101
DQ Mixed 1,258
938% 1250 MB/s
Poor: 299%
This bench: 432%
Great: 592%
Samsung 870 QVO 4TB-$280
3TB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 915 508 474 542 509 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 70% Great: 128%
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 4TB-$326
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0B2QJXG7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3143 3123 3147 3148 3147 3139 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
411% Outstanding
Read 2,558
Write 3273
Mixed 2,621
SusWrite 3141
656% 2,898 MB/s
4K Read 58.1
4K Write 76.2
4K Mixed 60
205% 64.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,364
DQ Write 1,054
DQ Mixed 1,247
922% 1,222 MB/s
Poor: 315%
This bench: 411%
Great: 616%
WD Red Pro 6TB (2015)-$239
424GB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 118 123 121 118 116 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 114
Write 118
Mixed 64
SusWrite 118
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 0.6
218% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 122%
Minipro RAID V3 RAID 1 5TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 94 95 92 94 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
49% Average
Read 76.3
Write 88.4
Mixed 70.1
SusWrite 94.7
61% 82.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 49%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-6000J3040G324x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
148% Outstanding
MC Read 66.4
MC Write 44
MC Mixed 49.2
152% 53.2 GB/s
SC Read 49.5
SC Write 49.8
SC Mixed 47.5
140% 48.9 GB/s
Latency 60.2
66% 60.2 ns
Poor: 119%
This bench: 148%
Great: 186%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 34.1" 1280 720 DELA0FA Dell AW3418DW
Typical ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 402%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 528%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $2,395
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback