Asus ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 116%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive411% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory110.8 GB free of 128 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230928
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateOct 31 '23 at 14:01
Run Duration384 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$310
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Memory 91.2
1-Core 193
2-Core 386
118% 224 Pts
4-Core 751
8-Core 1,281
123% 1,016 Pts
64-Core 1,701
105% 1,701 Pts
Poor: 105%
This bench: 116%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7800-XT
Sapphire(1DA2 D475) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.10.2
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 245
Reflection 249
Parallax 465
199% 320 fps
Gravity 285
Splatting 274
247% 280 fps
Poor: 130% Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
912GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3261 3150 3128 3378 3384 3339 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
411% Outstanding
Read 2552
Write 3450
Mixed 2,772
SusWrite 3,273
683% 3,012 MB/s
4K Read 49.1
4K Write 84
4K Mixed 56.5
191% 63.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,355
DQ Write 906
DQ Mixed 1,222
887% 1,161 MB/s
Poor: 299%
This bench: 411%
Great: 592%
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
1.5TB free
Firmware: 3B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3171 3388 3382 3380 3418 3370 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
426% Outstanding
Read 2,646
Write 3514
Mixed 2,692
SusWrite 3,351
691% 3,051 MB/s
4K Read 49.7
4K Write 86.4
4K Mixed 61.4
200% 65.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,408
DQ Write 982
DQ Mixed 1,254
920% 1,215 MB/s
Poor: 299%
This bench: 426%
Great: 592%
Samsung 870 QVO 4TB-$280
3TB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 457 460 460 459 461 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 441
Mixed 411
SusWrite 458
101% 450 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 54.2
4K Mixed 39.1
130% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 376
DQ Mixed 374
283% 379 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 105%
Great: 128%
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 4TB-$326
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0B2QJXG7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2947 2967 2993 2973 2965 2941 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
395% Outstanding
Read 2,446
Write 2,982
Mixed 2,670
SusWrite 2,964
626% 2,766 MB/s
4K Read 54.8
4K Write 72.5
4K Mixed 63.2
202% 63.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,388
DQ Write 1,018
DQ Mixed 1,263
927% 1,223 MB/s
Poor: 315%
This bench: 395%
Great: 616%
WD Red Pro 6TB (2015)-$239
424GB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 118 123 121 118 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 112
Write 115
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 119
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 0.7
227% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 122%
Minipro RAID V3 RAID 1 5TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 99 100 97 98 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 76.9
Write 91.1
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 99.2
61% 82.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.6
154% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-6000J3040G324x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
137% Outstanding
MC Read 58.6
MC Write 41.9
MC Mixed 47.2
141% 49.2 GB/s
SC Read 51.3
SC Write 42.9
SC Mixed 44.1
132% 46.1 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 119%
This bench: 137%
Great: 186%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 34.1" 1280 720 DELA0FA Dell AW3418DW
Typical ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 402%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 528%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $2,395
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback