Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JF_F515JF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JF_F515JF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X515JF
Memory7.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220905
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateOct 31 '23 at 11:42
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1035G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Memory 64.7
1-Core 87.3
2-Core 149
58% 100 Pts
4-Core 247
8-Core 84.5
26% 166 Pts
64-Core 344
21% 344 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Asus(1043 1EFF) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
3.21% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 6.3
Parallax 5.5
4% 5.67 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 0.2
1% 1.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.21%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GB
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7101Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 139 135 135 133 132 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
98% Outstanding
Read 930
Write 137
Mixed 237
SusWrite 134
78% 360 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 90.4
4K Mixed 38.5
148% 54.1 MB/s
DQ Read 238
DQ Write 92.1
DQ Mixed 128
104% 152 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 98%
Great: 169%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 8A76 LD4AS008G-3200ST 12GB
3200, 3200 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.8% Below average
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 13.6
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 20.6
SC Mixed 15.5
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 56 29 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15F5
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JF_F515JF Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JF_F515JF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback