MSI B350 PC MATE (MS-7A34)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive220% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A34
MotherboardMSI B350 PC MATE (MS-7A34)  (all builds)
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170622
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 30 '23 at 20:54
Run Duration260 Seconds
Run User GEO-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 68.9
1-Core 107
2-Core 215
72% 130 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 820
74% 624 Pts
64-Core 1,120
69% 1,120 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.58
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27% Poor
Lighting 33.2
Reflection 37.3
Parallax 27.2
27% 32.6 fps
MRender 35.8
Gravity 39.8
Splatting 26
27% 33.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team TM8FPD512G 512GB
362GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H221124a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2020 1924 490 272 215 164 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
220% Outstanding
Read 1,903
Write 2,256
Mixed 1817
SusWrite 848
384% 1,706 MB/s
4K Read 52.6
4K Write 88.3
4K Mixed 63.3
208% 68.1 MB/s
DQ Read 777
DQ Write 448
DQ Mixed 608
454% 611 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 220%
Great: 307%
Team T253128GB 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: HP2818E3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 434 442 435 413 432 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 492
Write 452
Mixed 399
SusWrite 432
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 84.6
4K Mixed 13.6
108% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 16.5
66% 140 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 87%
Team T253128GB 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: HP2818E3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 435 441 435 415 427 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Read 490
Write 452
Mixed 398
SusWrite 432
100% 443 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 83.5
4K Mixed 14
107% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 16.6
66% 140 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 87%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
234GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1H5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 266 270 382 276 264 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Read 218
Write 138
Mixed 194
SusWrite 303
48% 213 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 75.9
4K Mixed 36.6
133% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 190
172% 260 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 102%
Spcc Solid State Disk 120GB
50GB free
Firmware: SBFM71.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 54 54 54 54 54 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 396
Write 131
Mixed 278
SusWrite 86.1
49% 223 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 74.4
4K Mixed 22
108% 41 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 140
138% 213 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2133 C15 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.4% Very good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 24.6
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 22.7
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 42 8 60 27" 1280 751 DEL40BB DELL S2715H
Typical B350 PC MATE (MS-7A34) Builds (Compare 1,686 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI B350 PC MATE (MS-7A34) - $184

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $535
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback