Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 178%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 183%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics211% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive240% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory56.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 30 '23 at 20:26
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Memory 72.1
1-Core 155
2-Core 303
94% 177 Pts
4-Core 547
8-Core 1,016
93% 781 Pts
64-Core 1,383
86% 1,383 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 545.92
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
211% Outstanding
Lighting 310
Reflection 287
Parallax 326
253% 308 fps
MRender 353
Gravity 256
Splatting 188
208% 266 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 211%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate BarraCuda 120 SSD ZA2000CM10003 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: STZSE015
SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 450 452 457 455 455 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 493
Write 455
Mixed 412
SusWrite 452
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 99.6
4K Mixed 24.5
105% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 40.2
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 68.3
67% 101 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 135%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
457GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1981 473 142 140 168 164 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
240% Outstanding
Read 1,714
Write 2,278
Mixed 1,893
SusWrite 511
360% 1,599 MB/s
4K Read 61.2
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 88.2
297% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,219
DQ Write 952
DQ Mixed 1,060
800% 1,077 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 240%
Great: 365%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3200C16-16GVK Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 F4-3200C16-16GVK Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
62.3% Good
MC Read 24.9
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 24.3
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 23.5
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 26
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 95
42% 95 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 141%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 240 27" 1280 720 AOC2702 27G2G8
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,034 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,018
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback