Asus P8P67

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics77.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive64.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8P67  (all builds)
Memory15.5 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110302
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateOct 29 '23 at 21:07
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Memory 86
1-Core 84.9
2-Core 166
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 318
43% 319 Pts
64-Core 318
20% 318 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.5% Very good
Lighting 94.9
Reflection 108
Parallax 97.8
77% 100 fps
MRender 92.5
Gravity 96.8
Splatting 95.5
78% 94.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$123
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 205 230 234 207 184 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 342
Write 237
Mixed 247
SusWrite 202
58% 257 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 44.6
4K Mixed 30.4
101% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 161
121% 163 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 124%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
374GB free
Firmware: SVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 212 230 241 245 245 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
69.2% Good
Read 248
Write 235
Mixed 231
SusWrite 220
53% 234 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 48.9
4K Mixed 37
121% 39.1 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 193
141% 185 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 137%
WDC WD20 EZRZ-00Z5HB0 2TB
997GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 14 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 52.7
Write 24.7
Mixed 25
SusWrite 14.5
34% 29.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 1
58% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 21%
WDC WD20 EFRX-68EUZN0 2TB
69GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 14 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 55.2
Write 25.2
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 14.6
34% 29.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.9
49% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 52%
WDC WD10 EARS-00Y5B1 1TB
156GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 63
Write 15.5
Mixed 17.2
SusWrite 10.9
28% 26.6 MB/s
4K Read 11.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.3
53% 3.93 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL10S-8GBX F3-12800CL10S-8GBX F3-12800CL9-2GBXL F3-12800CL9-2GBXL 20GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.4% Below average
MC Read 12
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 10.9
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 11.7
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 72.1
55% 72.1 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 60 27" 1280 720 BNQ8038 BenQ PD2725U
Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,499 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $666
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback