MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 113%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive305% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory56.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220825
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 29 '23 at 12:36
Run Duration252 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 80.7
1-Core 176
2-Core 321
103% 193 Pts
4-Core 653
8-Core 1,106
107% 880 Pts
64-Core 1,526
94% 1,526 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 101%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-XT-$300
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.9.2
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 137
Parallax 242
94% 165 fps
MRender 220
Gravity 122
Splatting 186
144% 176 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 109%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Predator GM7000 2TB
381GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.A.F.12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2587 1572 2064 1249 1859 1278 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
305% Outstanding
Read 2,242
Write 4,057
Mixed 2,613
SusWrite 1,768
606% 2,670 MB/s
4K Read 64.4
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 77.6
255% 84 MB/s
DQ Read 772
DQ Write 468
DQ Mixed 654
478% 632 MB/s
Poor: 254%
This bench: 305%
Great: 618%
Crucial_CT2050MX300SSD1 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: M0CR031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 438 331 247 262 253 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 237
Write 242
Mixed 168
SusWrite 328
55% 244 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 76.6
4K Mixed 24.2
95% 38.7 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 276
196% 250 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 99%
HP EX920 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$116
168GB free
Firmware: SVN163 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1112 1168 1153 1203 1199 1179 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
248% Outstanding
Read 1,896
Write 1,200
Mixed 1,080
SusWrite 1,169
298% 1,337 MB/s
4K Read 52.8
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 66.6
220% 74.3 MB/s
DQ Read 803
DQ Write 638
DQ Mixed 646
504% 696 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 248%
Great: 355%
SABRENT 1TB
547GB free
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 335 333 344 336 342 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Sabrent 2TB
979GB free, PID 9210
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 36.5
Write 36.7
Mixed 36.4
SusWrite 38.2
51% 37 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 11.1
4K Mixed 8.6
739% 12.8 MB/s
DQ Read 15.1
DQ Write 21.5
DQ Mixed 12.2
1,202% 16.3 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 CL16-20-20 D4-3200 CL16-20-20 D4-3200 64GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
90.8% Outstanding
MC Read 38.6
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 35.2
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 27.4
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 31.8
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 91%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 34" 1280 720 ACR0763 EI342CKR
Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 17,588 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $898
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback