MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive168% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory57.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220825
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 04 '23 at 05:23
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 83.4
1-Core 169
2-Core 330
103% 194 Pts
4-Core 636
8-Core 1,097
105% 866 Pts
64-Core 1,475
91% 1,475 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 101%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-XT-$300
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.3.2
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 139
Parallax 243
94% 166 fps
MRender 221
Gravity 121
Splatting 183
143% 175 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 109%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNVS2000G 2TB
502GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8442105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1443 25 32 25 212 165 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
168% Outstanding
Read 2313
Write 25.1
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 317
143% 677 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 47.1
4K Mixed 15.2
99% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 743
DQ Write 501
DQ Mixed 524
418% 589 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 168%
Great: 255%
HP EX920 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$116
427GB free
Firmware: SVN163 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1126 1110 1153 1234 1250 1186 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
249% Outstanding
Read 1,955
Write 1,277
Mixed 1,129
SusWrite 1,177
309% 1,385 MB/s
4K Read 53.5
4K Write 97.1
4K Mixed 66.8
218% 72.5 MB/s
DQ Read 771
DQ Write 625
DQ Mixed 691
519% 696 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 249%
Great: 355%
Crucial_CT2050MX300SSD1 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: M0CR031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 428 453 310 272 260 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 328
Write 191
Mixed 169
SusWrite 339
58% 257 MB/s
4K Read 8.4
4K Write 77.6
4K Mixed 23.6
84% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 245
DQ Mixed 167
145% 214 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 99%
WD Gold 10TB (2016)-$254
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01H02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 129 133 136 130 130 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 129
Write 130
Mixed 83.1
SusWrite 132
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.4
298% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 133%
SABRENT 1TB
562GB free
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 753 714 752 797 802 772 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 CL16-20-20 D4-3200 CL16-20-20 D4-3200 64GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
90.6% Outstanding
MC Read 37.8
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 34.7
92% 32.2 GB/s
SC Read 28.2
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 36.2
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 91%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 17,588 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $898
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback