TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A63
MotherboardMSI Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63)  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170627
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateOct 29 '23 at 08:29
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$249
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 86.5
1-Core 127
2-Core 238
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 661
67% 544 Pts
64-Core 662
41% 662 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑
This bench: 82.9%
 Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Gigabyte(1458 3752)
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 545.84
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
112% Outstanding
Lighting 139
Reflection 224
Parallax 148
113% 170 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 182
Splatting 126
119% 148 fps
Poor: 109% ↑
This bench: 112%
 Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 525GB-$140
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR060
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 374
Write 455
Mixed 361
89% 397 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 83.7
4K Mixed 35.8
125% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 338
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 314
236% 316 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 98%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
60GB free
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 62 58 55 57 57 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 467
Write 342
Mixed 324
SusWrite 85.5
68% 305 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 73.2
4K Mixed 37.4
129% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 291
DQ Write 261
DQ Mixed 104
125% 219 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑
This bench: 76.3%
 Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
195GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 117 128 151 147 121 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 147
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 130
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑
This bench: 92.1%
 Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2133C14D4/8G 04CD F4-2133C15-8GIS 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68% Good
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 25.4
MC Mixed 20.5
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 20.6
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 37% ↑
This bench: 68%
 Great: 77%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 27" 1280 720 ACI27EC ROG PG279Q
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63) Builds (Compare 5,602 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI Z270 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7A63) - $175

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel  $249Bench 84%, 712,312 samples3,332x
Core i5-7600KIntel  $170Bench 76%, 195,006 samples913x
Core i7-6700KIntel  $170Bench 81%, 588,978 samples334x
GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia  $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples886x
GTX 1070Nvidia  $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples752x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia  $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples591x
SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples275x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung  $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples247x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung  $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples162x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair  $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples530x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples217x
Vengeance LED DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair  $192Bench 83%, 40,358 samples134x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $767
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback