MSI H67MA-ED55 (MS-7676)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.73% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive39.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7676
MotherboardMSI H67MA-ED55 (MS-7676)  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120112
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 29 '23 at 01:21
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$201
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 90.7
1-Core 91
2-Core 177
71% 120 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 392
42% 332 Pts
64-Core 406
25% 406 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
8.73% Terrible
Lighting 9.9
Reflection 14.3
Parallax 9.5
8% 11.2 fps
MRender 15.4
Gravity 11.4
Splatting 10.7
10% 12.5 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.73%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2016)-$84
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 80 84 86 89 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 350
Write 111
Mixed 153
SusWrite 87
38% 175 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 19.1
4K Mixed 13.1
58% 17.5 MB/s
DQ Read 29.4
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 16.4
28% 52.4 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 M378B5773DH0-CH9 M378B5773DH0-CH9 M378B5773CH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.5% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 14.8
44% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 15.3
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 23.1" 1280 720 GSM580C IPS236
Typical H67MA-ED55 (MS-7676) Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI H67MA-ED55 (MS-7676)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $455
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback