Asus PRIME B450M-A II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive147% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 6 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B450M-A II  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 29 '23 at 00:23
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Memory 72.4
1-Core 160
2-Core 312
96% 181 Pts
4-Core 553
8-Core 923
90% 738 Pts
64-Core 1,040
64% 1,040 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 99%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 8809) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.42
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Lighting 20.4
Reflection 19
Parallax 28.5
17% 22.6 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 24
Splatting 21.5
16% 18.7 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 21%
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Zotac(19DA 6617) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 151
Parallax 123
110% 137 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 101
Splatting 88.3
87% 109 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$99
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P2CR048 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1458 310 314 748 62 421 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
147% Outstanding
Read 662
Write 1,424
Mixed 830
SusWrite 552
197% 867 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 83.7
4K Mixed 44
140% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,046
DQ Write 877
DQ Mixed 1,026
751% 983 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 147%
Great: 299%
Hajaan 480G 479GB
302GB free
Firmware: S0423B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 232 6.7 71 6.7 71 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 490
Write 434
Mixed 360
SusWrite 126
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 96.7
4K Mixed 21.5
117% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 0.7
65% 150 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 72%
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
79GB free
Firmware: 2.15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 117 130 132 128 138 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 402
Write 150
Mixed 202
SusWrite 130
49% 221 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 71
4K Mixed 31.9
119% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 91
DQ Mixed 19.8
47% 99.7 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$60
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.8% Very good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 26.1
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 24.9
SC Mixed 23.9
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 99.4
40% 99.4 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 52 144 19.5" 1920 1080 SPT080D Sceptre E20
Typical PRIME B450M-A II Builds (Compare 4,695 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B450M-A II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $420
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback