Voyaguer Reason

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics88.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemVoyaguer Reason  (all builds)
MotherboardFoxconn H61MXE/-S/-V/-K
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 28 '23 at 21:15
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 96.7
2-Core 176
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 438
46% 366 Pts
64-Core 443
27% 443 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$330
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.1.2
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
88.7% Excellent
Lighting 92.1
Reflection 140
Parallax 176
75% 136 fps
MRender 202
Gravity 90
Splatting 136
115% 143 fps
Poor: 79%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 93%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$83
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 31 66 150 180 170 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 103
Write 18.7
Mixed 20.9
SusWrite 106
45% 62.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.5
213% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 110%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125
27GB free
Firmware: FP1R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 101 97 97 100 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 98.4
Write 117
Mixed 49.7
SusWrite 98.2
66% 90.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
212% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.3% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 16.6
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 16.6
48% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 58 31 75 34.1" 1280 720 GSM76F9 LG ULTRAWIDE
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback