Default LEMANS-I7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDefault LEMANS-I7  (all builds)
MotherboardUniversal LEMANS-I7
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210818
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 28 '23 at 20:31
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8559U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 67.2
1-Core 96.3
2-Core 179
64% 114 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 390
42% 332 Pts
64-Core 394
24% 394 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 59%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
Device(1E50 800C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8935
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.31% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 5.1
4% 4.4 fps
MRender 3.8
Gravity 6
Splatting 0.3
2% 3.37 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 3.31%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lifelong LF30S3M8 512GB
425GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0312A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 235 38 20 54 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
49% Average
Read 385
Write 332
Mixed 285
SusWrite 121
63% 280 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 38.8
4K Mixed 13.8
55% 21.3 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 46.4
81% 157 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown B14ASAG73222R 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.2% Above average
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 25.8
MC Mixed 11.5
57% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 10.1
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 98
41% 98 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 54 26 0 14" 1280 720 BOE08ED
Typical LEMANS-I7 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Default LEMANS-I7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback