bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics15.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardParallels Parallels Virtual Platform
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231014
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 28 '23 at 18:44
Run Duration264 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
CPU Socket #0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Memory 66.2
1-Core 90
2-Core 178
63% 111 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 261
35% 262 Pts
64-Core 271
17% 271 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Parallels Display Adapter (WDDM)
ParallelsVM(1AB8 0400) 2GB
Driver: prl_umdd.dll Ver. 19.1.0.54729
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
15.6% Very poor
Lighting 21.8
Reflection 26.8
Parallax 16.5
18% 21.7 fps
MRender 21.4
Gravity 2
Splatting 17.5
11% 13.6 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Parallels Virtual NVMe Disk 275GB
190GB free (System drive)
Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,552
Write 1,407
Mixed 1,468
398% 1,809 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 24.1
4K Mixed 26.8
90% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 143
110% 153 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 308%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 8 slots used
8GB DIMM DRAM 667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
76.6% Very good
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 34.4
MC Mixed 28.1
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 9.1
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 93.5
43% 93.5 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 58 60 0" 1280 720 PRL5000 Parallels Vu
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,497 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback