Asus TUF Gaming FX505GM_FX505GM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics48.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive125% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505GM_FX505GM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505GM
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210208
Uptime213.6 Days
Run DateOct 28 '23 at 04:31
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
67.9% Good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 112
2-Core 203
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 414
44% 352 Pts
64-Core 495
31% 495 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1B9E) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2849
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.7% Average
Lighting 58
Reflection 69.2
Parallax 60.9
47% 62.7 fps
MRender 66.4
Gravity 60.2
Splatting 62
51% 62.9 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GB
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20110000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 551 426 429 429 354 350 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 953
Write 1,161
Mixed 976
SusWrite 423
198% 878 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 78.2
4K Mixed 37.4
135% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 468
DQ Write 407
DQ Mixed 438
328% 438 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 125%
Great: 187%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$65
906GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 65 87 86 89 84 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 20% Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT16G4SFD8266.M16FE Hynix HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 32GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80.3% Excellent
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 24.8
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 34.2
SC Mixed 25.2
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 144 15.5" 1536 864 LGD05E8
Typical TUF Gaming FX505GM_FX505GM Builds (Compare 541 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505GM_FX505GM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback