Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X513EAN_K513EA

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	87.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 6 months ago.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X513EAN_K513EA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X513EAN
Memory	1.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20220421
Uptime	6.8 Days
Run Date	Oct 28 '23 at 02:52
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	55%

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-1115G4 18,815 User benchmarks, average bench 51% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	43.3% Average	Memory 56.1 1-Core 75.8 2-Core 129 50% 86.8 Pts	4-Core 175 8-Core 190 24% 182 Pts	64-Core 192 12% 192 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 39,662 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Asus(1043 1C22) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.3111 Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	4.86% Terrible	Lighting 5.5 Reflection 6.1 Parallax 6.9 4% 6.17 fps	MRender 7.2 Gravity 7.1 Splatting 6.4 6% 6.9 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 4.86% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON OM8PDP3256B-AB1 256GB 745 User benchmarks, average bench 136% 104GB free (System drive) Firmware: EDFK0SA6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 453 451 241 385 445 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	87.9% Excellent	Read 177 Write 280 Mixed 278 SusWrite 389 64% 281 MB/s	4K Read 26.1 4K Write 94.4 4K Mixed 29.2 127% 49.9 MB/s	DQ Read 528 DQ Write 320 DQ Mixed 381 295% 409 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 87.9% Great: 195%
LG External HDD 500GB 207 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 28GB free, PID 70f5 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 34 35 37 37 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	17.9% Very poor	Read 51.9 Write 29.5 Mixed 25 SusWrite 35.3 45% 35.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.6 51% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 1x8GB 19,438 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 8 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	27.6% Poor	MC Read 11 MC Write 9.6 MC Mixed 8.3 28% 9.63 GB/s	SC Read 7.1 SC Write 9.2 SC Mixed 6.9 22% 7.73 GB/s	Latency 134 30% 134 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	57	60	15.5"	1280 720	SDC4161

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X513EAN_K513EA Builds (Compare 1,134 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 15%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X513EAN_K513EA

CPU
Core i5-1135G7IntelBench 69%, 36,962 samples	665x
Core i3-1115G4IntelBench 51%, 18,815 samples	229x
Core i7-1165G7IntelBench 66%, 51,565 samples	227x

GPU
Iris XeIntelBench 14%, 144,774 samples	892x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 9%, 39,662 samples	242x

SSD
INTEL SSDPEKNW512G8 512GBNvmeBench 149%, 6,470 samples	349x
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GBNvmeBench 160%, 1,535 samples	338x
KINGSTON OM8PDP3256B-AB1 256GBNvmeBench 136%, 745 samples	198x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CWE M471A5244BB0-CWE 8GBSamsungBench 62%, 1,146 samples	290x
M471A1G44AB0-CWE Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 16GBSamsungBench 62%, 1,848 samples	174x
M471A1G44AB0-CWE M471A5244BB0-CWE 12GBSamsungBench 59%, 170 samples	113x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16