Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X513EAN_K513EA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive131% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X513EAN_K513EA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X513EAN
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220421
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 27 '23 at 12:57
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1115G4
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Memory 57.2
1-Core 94.3
2-Core 145
57% 98.9 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 248
34% 250 Pts
64-Core 237
15% 237 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 1C22) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.3111
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
7.06% Terrible
Lighting 7.6
Reflection 5.3
Parallax 11.1
6% 8 fps
MRender 10.8
Gravity 11.4
Splatting 10.1
9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.06%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON OM8PDP3256B-AB1 256GB
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0SA6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 542 327 517 290 314 271 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 928
Write 1,040
Mixed 344
SusWrite 377
150% 672 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 64.8
4K Mixed 55
112% 41.6 MB/s
DQ Read 776
DQ Write 694
DQ Mixed 694
532% 721 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 131%
Great: 195%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 8 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.4% Below average
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 9.1
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 6.6
21% 7.3 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X513EAN_K513EA Builds (Compare 1,136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X513EAN_K513EA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback