Asus Zephyrus G GU502DU_GA502DU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (0th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 100 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics2.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemAsus Zephyrus G GU502DU_GA502DU  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GU502DU
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210310
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 27 '23 at 18:32
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 94%

 PC Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 0.4 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 7.6
2-Core 17.9
6% 12.8 Pts
4-Core 29.5
8-Core 34.6
4% 32 Pts
64-Core 42.8
3% 42.8 Pts
Poor: 33% Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
Asus(1043 18D1) 128MB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 20.10.32
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.46% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 4.4
2% 3.43 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 3.4
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.9 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 2.46%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 48 101 50 51 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 539
Write 481
Mixed 467
SusWrite 110
89% 399 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 12.2
4K Mixed 11.2
38% 11.7 MB/s
DQ Read 65.9
DQ Write 45.3
DQ Mixed 55.5
42% 55.6 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 209%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB
108GB free
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 195 206 209 206 210 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 554
Write 540
Mixed 493
SusWrite 229
102% 454 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 13.9
4K Mixed 11.4
36% 11.6 MB/s
DQ Read 85.4
DQ Write 60.7
DQ Mixed 67.3
52% 71.1 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 199%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 TEAMGROUP-SD4-2400 16GB
2667, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
MC Read 3.2
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 6.2
13% 4.63 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 5.4
11% 3.97 GB/s
Latency 557
7% 557 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 5 2 120 15.5" 1280 720 NCP0036
Typical Zephyrus G GU502DU_GA502DU Builds (Compare 600 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Zephyrus G GU502DU_GA502DU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback