MSI X99A GODLIKE GAMING (MS-7883)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics48.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory112GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 112GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7883
MotherboardMSI X99A GODLIKE GAMING (MS-7883)  (all builds)
Memory103.8 GB free of 112 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190613
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateOct 27 '23 at 10:31
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User KWT-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$599
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 95.9
2-Core 195
71% 125 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 626
61% 498 Pts
64-Core 811
50% 811 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1216 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.9.2
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.2% Average
Lighting 61.6
Reflection 36.6
Parallax 80.3
50% 59.5 fps
MRender 58.2
Gravity 68.1
Splatting 40.9
44% 55.7 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Cs900 SSD 240GB
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 17 91 23 47 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 475
Write 407
Mixed 40.4
SusWrite 85.8
56% 252 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 73.2
4K Mixed 0.4
67% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 19.5
DQ Mixed 0.5
19% 48.8 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 96%
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$99
101GB free
Firmware: P2CR Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 650 647 643 649 560 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
145% Outstanding
Read 609
Write 570
Mixed 624
SusWrite 540
132% 586 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 96.4
4K Mixed 55
184% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 710
DQ Write 652
DQ Mixed 734
536% 699 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 145%
Great: 299%
Toshiba MQ01ACF050R 500GB
1GB free
Firmware: 1A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 92.5
Write 73.4
Mixed 46.8
52% 70.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 67%
Samsung UHD Video Pack 500GB
123GB free, PID 62c8
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 42 40 40 38 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Read 50.3
Write 40.4
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 39.3
54% 41.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
102% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 AX4U360016G18I-DCWH DDR4 3600 Micron TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 AX4U360016G18I-DCWH DDR4 3600 Micron 112GB
2400, 2667, 2667, 2667, 2400, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 8192, 16384, 16384, 16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
101% Outstanding
MC Read 39.6
MC Write 40
MC Mixed 37.3
111% 39 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 20.3
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 101%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 59 60 27.5" 2560 1377 SAM0B80 U28D590
Typical X99A GODLIKE GAMING (MS-7883) Builds (Compare 265 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X99A GODLIKE GAMING (MS-7883) - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,279
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback